Barriers in Fieldwork Practice for Social Work Students: Challenges and Pathways for Reform
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3126/irjmmc.v6i5.89082Keywords:
social work education, fieldwork barriers, placement opportunities, institutional collaborationAbstract
Fieldwork practice assists on the basis of social work education, helping as the connection between theoretical knowledge and practical application. Despite its significance, social work trainees often face challenges that limit the effectiveness of field education. This study explores the barriers faced during fieldwork practice and identifies pathways for reform. A qualitative exploratory research design was adopted, involving 11 students from different semesters and backgrounds who had completed at least one field placement, purposively selected for this study, guided by data saturation. In 2025, primary data were collected through semi-structured interviews and focus group discussion and thematically analyzed, completed by secondary data from previous literature. Findings exposed multiple barriers, including inadequate supervision, limited and inequitable placement opportunities, financial constraints, weak coordination between universities and field agencies, and cultural or community-based challenges. These obstacles often hinder students’ confidence, learning outcomes, and professional readiness. However, students also identified valuable learning experiences such as improved communication, counseling skills, and professional identity development. Suggested reforms included structured supervision, expansion of placement opportunities, particularly in rural and community-based settings, financial stipends, institutional monitoring, and stronger collaboration between universities and field agencies. The study concludes that systemic reforms are essential to improve the accessibility, equity, and quality of field education. Strengthening supervision, diversifying placements, and ensuring financial and institutional support can better prepare social work students for professional roles, ultimately improving the overall quality and impact of social work education. In this study will benefit students, educators, and institutions by enhancing field placement experiences.
Downloads
References
1. Afrouz, R., & Crisp, B. R. (2021). Online education in social work, effectiveness, benefits, and challenges: A scoping review. Australian Social Work, 74(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0312407x.2020.1808030
2. Bergsteiner, H., Avery, G. C., & Neumann, R. (2010). Kolb’s experiential learning model: critique from a modelling perspective. Studies in Continuing Education, 32(1), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/01580370903534355
3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
4. Carvalho, J. de, Chima, F. O., & Spears, B. (2025). Key contributing factors to field placement effectiveness in online and applied programs. Journal of Social Work and Social Welfare Policy, 3(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.33790/jswwp1100137
5. Cornish, C., Jong, S. T., Albarran, I., Kale, S., Brownsword, S., Playfair, C., Vauzour, S., Odu, T., Lusigi, G., & Shikuku, V. (2025). Taking a cross-faculty stand against racism and inequality: What are enabling and inhibiting factors influencing the placement experiences of black, asian, ethnic minoritised students in the schools of social work, education, and health sciences? Genealogy, 9(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy9010021
6. Drisko, J., & Grady, M. D. (2018). Teaching evidence-based practice u using cases in social work education. Families in Society, 99(3), 269–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/1044389418785331
7. Erdley, S. D., Anklam, D. D., & Reardon, C. C. (2014). Breaking barriers and building bridges: Understanding the pervasive needs of older LGBT adults and the value of social work in health care. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 57(2–4), 362–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2013.871381
8. Fantinelli, S., Cortini, M., Di Fiore, T., Iervese, S., & Galanti, T. (2024). Bridging the gap between theoretical learning and practical application: A qualitative study in the Italian educational context. Education Sciences, 14(2), 198. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14020198
9. Grafstrom, M., Jonsson, A., & Klintman, M. (2025). Embracing the academic–practice gap: Knowledge collaboration and the role of institutional knotting. Management Learning, 56(2), 160–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505076231213056
10. Gursansky, D., & Le Sueur, E. (2012). Conceptualising field education in the twenty-first century: Contradictions, challenges and opportunities. Social Work Education, 31(7), 914–931. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2011.595784
11. Halabieh, H., Hawkins, S., Bernstein, A. E., Lewkowict, S., Unaldi Kamel, B., Fleming, L., & Levitin, D. (2022). The future of higher education: identifying current educational problems and proposed solutions. Education Sciences, 12(12), 888. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12120888/s1
12. Hamer, J. F., & Lang, C. (2015). Race, structural violence, and the neoliberal university: The challenges of inhabitation. Critical Sociology, 41(6), 897–912. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920515594765
13. Hernandez Garcia, J. M., Pujolar, J., & Fernandez Gonzalez, N. (2025). Agency as doing-together: Learning from fieldwork experiences. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2025(291), 113–139. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2023-0080
14. Hora, M. T., Wolfgram, M., Chen, Z., & Lee, C. (2021). Closing the doors of opportunity: A field theoretic analysis of the prevalence and nature of obstacles to college internships. Teachers College Record, 123(12), 180–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/01614681211070875
15. Hossain, M. I., Islam, M. S., Ali, I., & Azman, A. (2025). Challenges of social work field practicum and professionalization in Bangladesh. Social Work Education, 44(1), 86–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2024.2339468
16. Jackson, D. (2015). Employability skill development in work-integrated learning: Barriers and best practice. Studies in Higher Education, 40(2), 350–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.842221
17. Landsman, M. J., & Rathman, D. (2023). Rural challenges in social work regulation. Research on Social Work Practice, 33(1), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497315221118360
18. Liu, M., Sun, F., & Anderson, S. G. (2013). Challenges in social work field education in China: Lessons from the Western experience. Social Work Education, 32(2), 179–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2012.723682
19. Loganathan, T., Ong, Z. L., Hassan, F., Chan, Z. X., & Majid, H. A. (2023). Barriers and facilitators to education access for marginalised non-citizen children in Malaysia: A qualitative study. PLoS ONE, 18(6), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0286793
20. Marginson, S. (2016). The worldwide trend to high participation higher education: Dynamics of social stratification in inclusive systems. Higher Education, 72(4), 413–434. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0016-x
21. Matthew, L. E., & Lough, B. J. (2017). Challenges social work students encounter in International field placements and recommendations for responsible management. Journal of Social Work Education, 53(1), 18–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2016.1246268
22. McGuire, L. E., & Lay, K. A. (2020). Reflective pedagogy for social work education: Integrating classroom and field for competency-based education. Journal of Social Work Education, 56(3), 519–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2019.1661898
23. Oli, L. B., & Woli, L. (2024). Assessing the socio-economic impacts of solar home systems on Chingad, Surkhet. International Research Journal of MMC, 5(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3126/irjmmc.v5I4.70638
24. Oli, L. B., & Woli, L. (2025). Impact of sustainable sanitation and hygiene programs on rural household practices: A community-based study. Journal of Vishwa Adarsha College, 2(1), 135–156. https://doi.org/10.3126/jovac.v2I1.83883
25. Padda, K. K. (2024). Bridging theory and practice: Teaching qualitative field research methods in sociology and criminology. Journal of Security, Intelligence, and Resilience Education, 18(6), 1–9.
26. Peer, B. (2020). Inequality and access to education: Bridging the gap in the 21st century. Review Journal of Social Psychology & Social Works, 1(3), 156–167. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.71145/rjsp.v1i3.27
27. Pierszalowski, S., Bouwma Gearhart, J., & Marlow, L. (2021). A systematic review of barriers to accessing undergraduate research for STEM students: Problematizing under-researched factors for students of color. Social Sciences, 10(9), 328 – 371. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10090328
28. Richard, L. F. (2008). Exploring connections between theory and practice: Stories from fieldwork supervisors. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health, 24(2), 154–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/01642120802055259;CTYPE:STRING:JOURNAL
29. Ross, E., & Ncube, M. (2018). Student social workers’ experiences of supervision. Indian Journal of Social Work, 79(1), 31–54. https://doi.org/10.32444/ijsw.2018.79.1.31-54
30. Sato, E., Shyyan, V., Chauhan, S., & Christensen, L. (2024). Putting AI in fair: A framework for equity in AI-driven learner models and inclusive assessments. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 15(Special Issue), 263–281. https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.1526527
31. Simon, J. D., Boyd, R., & Subica, A. M. (2022). Refocusing intersectionality in social work education: Creating a brave space to discuss oppression and privilege. Journal of Social Work Education, 58(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2021.1883492
32. Singh, D. B. (2025). The impact of study abroad programs on local communities in Nepal: A case study approach. Interdisciplinary Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 6(1), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.3126/ijmss.v6i1.75396
33. Thiem, K. C., & Dasgupta, N. (2022). From precollege to career: Barriers facing historically marginalized students and evidence-based solutions. Social Issues and Policy Review, 16(1), 212–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12085
34. Wayne, J., Raskin, M., & Bogo, M. (2010). Field education as the signature pedagogy of social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 46(3), 327–339. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5175/jswe.2010.200900043
35. Woli, L. (2022). Impact of homestays on socio-economic opportunities of the local community. KMC Journal, 4(2), 212–223. https://doi.org/10.3126/kmcj.v4I2.47779
36. Woli, L. (2023a). Ethical challenges faced by social work trainee during fieldwork practice: students’ perspectives. Scholars’ Journal, 6(1), 68–83. https://doi.org/10.3126/scholars.v6i1.69995
37. Woli, L. (2023b). Issues and challenges in fieldwork practice of social workers in the context of Nepal. International Journal of Education, Culture and Society, 8(4), 170 –177. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijecs.20230804.13
38. Woli, L. (2024). Development of social work education in Nepal: A historical review. Siddhajyoti Interdisciplinary Journal, 5(1), 44–58. https://doi.org/10.3126/sij.v5I1.63598
39. Wu, L., Huang, Y., Chen, Q., & Shi, Y. (2021). Social work students’ experiences of ethical difficulties in field placements: A qualitative study in China. The British Journal of Social Work, 51(2), 505–523. https://doi.org/10.1093//bjsw/bcaa174
40. Zembylas, M. (2018). Reinventing critical pedagogy as decolonizing pedagogy: The education of empathy. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 40(5), 404–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714413.2019.1570794
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Research Journal of MMC (IRJMMC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
