Revisiting Consumer Behavior: Dominant Factors Shaping Consumer Rationality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3126/irjmmc.v7i1.93010Abstract
Consumer rationality concerned with the consumer behavior theory plays a significant role in the analysis of economic theories. Since rationality has been mainly influenced by a number of personal and socio-economic factors; age, education, gender, occupation, family size, individual’s income and expenditure, there exists a relationship between rationality and among these factors. To examine whether such a linkage between the factors ensue or not in the developing countries’ markets is the major focus of this study. If such a linkage exists, what are the dominant factors affecting rationality among them is another concern. To this extent, three dimensions – price, quality and brand were taken as the proxies of consumer rationality and data were collected through survey method by sending questionnaires to the respondents. Under the quantitative research design, the logistic regression model was employed to analyze the data. The results showed that all of the explanatory factors used in the system had more or less significant effect on the concerned rationality factors. The estimated results of the three models showed that the effect of education and occupation in all odd ratios was strong, the effect of age and expenditure hindered and nearly no effect of gender, family size and income. Therefore, among the explanatory variables taken in the estimation, education and occupation are the dominant factors in consumer rationality in Nepal. In the case of developing countries, it may have a significant importance to enhance the consumer’s knowledge to the concerned stakeholders, producers, researchers and policy makers in their way of business and living in the present context.
Downloads
References
1. Anckar, B. (2003). Drivers and inhibitors to ecommerce adoption: Exploring the rationality of consumer behavior in the electronic marketplace [Paper presentation]. The 11th Europen Conference on Information System, ECIS-2003 Naples, Italey. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2003/24/
2. Arcidiacono, D., Pais, I., Verbruggen, A. & Couder, J. (2011). Consumer rationality in a multidisciplinary perspective. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 40(5), 516-522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2011.01.003
3. Arnould, E. J., & Thompson, C. J. (2005). Consumer culture theory (CCT): Twenty years of research. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4), 868 – 882. https://doi.org/10.1086/426626
4. Arrow, K. J., (1986). Rationality of self and others in an economic system. The Journal of Business, 59(4), S385-S399. Retrieved on July 5, 2022, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2352770
5. Arrow, K. J., (2018). Economic theory and the hypothesis of rationality. In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 3397-3406, Macmillan publishers. DOI:10.1057/978-1-349-95189-5_438
6. Balakrishnan, (Sundar), P. V., Nataraajan, R. & Desain, A. (2000). Consumer rationality and economic efficiency: Is the assumed link justified? Faculty.Washington.Edu. Retrieved on July 5, 2022, from https://faculty.washington.edu/sundar/PAPERS/ConsumerEfficiencyDEA-MMJ.pdf
7. Bagozzi, R. P. (1982). A field investigation of causal relations among cognitions, affect, intentions, and behaviour. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4), 562-684.
8. Bass, F. M. & Talarzyk, W. W. (1972). An attitude model for the study of brand preference. Journal of Marketing Research, 9(1), 93-96.
9. Bazerman, M. H. (2001). Consumer research for consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(4), 499-504. https://doi.org/10.1086/319624
10. Brito, D. L., & Hartley, P. R. (1995). Consumer rationality and credit cards. Journal of Political Economy, 103(2), 400–433. https://doi.org/10.1086/261988
11. Carroll, C. D. & Weil, D. N. (1994). Saving and growth: A reinterpretation. Carnegie Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 40, 133–92.
12. Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.), John Wiley & Sons, New York.
13. Cocks, K. and Torgerson, D. J. (2013). Sample size calculations for pilot randomized trials: A confidence interval approach. Journal of Clinical Epistemology, 66, 197-201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.09.002
14. Dean, J. W. & Sharfman, M. P. (1993). Procedural rationality in the strategic decision‐making process. Journal of Management Studies, 30(4), 587-610, Wiley Blackwell. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486. 1993.tb00317.x
15. Dhar, R., Novemsky, N. (2008). Beyond rationality: The content of preferences. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18(3) 175–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2008.04.004
16. Duesenberry, J. S. (1949). Income, saving, and the theory of consumer behavior. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
17. Ebrahim, R. S., Ghoneim, A. & Irani, Z. (2016). A brand preference and repurchase intention model: the role of consumer experience. Journal of Marketing Management, 32(13):1-30. DOI:10.1080/0267257X.2016.1150322
18. Friedman, M. P. (1967). Quality and price c in rational consumer decision making, The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 1(1), 13-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.1967.tb00790.x
19. Hartman, R., Doane, M., & Woo, C. (1991). Consumer rationality and the status quo. Academic.Oup.Com, 106(1), 141-162. Retrieved on July 5, 2022, from https://academic.oup.com/qje/article-abstract/106/1/141/1928470
20. Hovenkamp, H. (1991). Rationality in law and economics. Geo. Wash. L. Rev., 60, 293. Retrieved on July 5, 2022, from https://heinonline.org/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/gwlr60§ion=17
21. Jacoby, J. (2000). Is it rational to assume consumer rationality: Some consumer psychological perspective on rational choice theory. Roger Williams UL Rev., 6, 81. Retrieved July 5, 2022, from https://heinonline.org/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/rwulr6§ion=10
22. Kothari, C. R. (2011). Research methodology: Methods and techniques. New Age International, New Delhi.
23. Liu, L. (2018). Biostatistical basis of inference in heart failure study. In Heart Failure: Epidemiology and Research Methods, 43-82. DOI:10.1016/B978-0-323-48558-6.00004-9
24. Madnani, G.M.K. (2015). Introduction to econometrics: Principles and applications, CBS Publishers & Distributors.
25. McFadden, S. H. (1996). Religion, spirituality, and aging. In J. E. Birren, K. W. Schaie, R. P. Abeles, M. Gatz, & T. A. Salthouse (eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (4th ed., pp. 162–177), Academic Press.
26. Menon, M. E., Saiti, A., & Socratous, M. (2007). Rationality, information search and choice in higher education: Evidence from Greece. Higher Education, 54(5), 705–721. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10734-006-9019-3
27. Mocan, N., (2007). Can consumers detect lemons? An empirical analysis of information asymmetry in the market for child care. Journal of Population Economics, 20(4), 743–780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-006-0087-6
28. Modigliani, F. (1970). The life cycle hypothesis of saving and intercountry differences in the saving ratio. In Induction, Growth and Trade: Essays in Honour of Sir Roy Harrod (eds.) by Walter A. Eltis, Maurice F. Scott, and James N. Wolfe, London: Clarendon Press.
29. Ramya, N. & Ali, S. M. (2016). Factors affecting consumer buying behavior. Int. J. Appl. Res., 2, 76–80.
30. Redmond, W. H. (2000). Consumer rationality and consumer sovereignty. Review of Social Economy, 58(2), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/003467600402530
31. Soster, M. & Ristanovi´c, V. (2023). Assessment of influencing factors on consumer behavior using the AHP model. Sustainability, 15(13), 10341-1034. DOI: 10.3390/su151310341
32. Suwal, B. R. (2020). Research methodology: applied survey sampling. Heritage publishers and distributers.
33. Tellis, G. J., & Gaeth, G. J. (1990). Best value, price-seeking, and price aversion: The impact of information and learning on consumer choices. Journal of Marketing, 54(2), 34-45. Retrieved on July 5, 2022, from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/002224299005400203
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Research Journal of MMC (IRJMMC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
