Factors Influencing Mathematics Achievement Among Secondary Students in Nepal: Evidence from Hierarchical Regression Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3126/irjmmc.v7i1.93098Keywords:
mathematics achievement, student self-efficacy, secondary education, regression analysis, urban–rural gapAbstract
Secondary-level mathematics achievement is vital for students’ academic growth and future science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) opportunities. However, many students in developing countries still perform poorly in mathematics. This study aims to investigate the key factors influencing mathematics achievement among secondary school students in Nepal. A quantitative survey research design was conducted with 206 Grade 9 and 10 students from six urban and rural public schools in Makwanpur district in 2025. Data were collected via a structured questionnaire on learning factors and students’ mathematics scores from school records. SPSS was used for descriptive statistics, correlation, and regression analyses to determine each factor’s impact on achievement. The findings reveal that student-related factors, particularly self-efficacy, motivation and study habits, are the strongest predictors of mathematics achievement (β = 0.497, p < .001). School-related factors and parental or socioeconomic support also demonstrate significant positive contributions, while teacher-related variables do not show a significant independent effect when other variables are controlled. A moderate but significant achievement gap between urban and rural students was found. The study emphasizes improving student motivation, learning strategies, and educational resources—especially in rural schools—to enhance mathematics achievement and reduce disparities.
Downloads
References
1. Adhikari, R. P., Nepal, B., Manandhar, D. C., Bhandari, R. B., Dahal, B., & Manandhar, N. (2024). The impact of teachers’ qualifications on classroom performance: A comparative analysis. A Peer Reviewed Journal on Social Science, 2(2), 33-44. https://doi.org/10.3126/aprjss.v2i2.77488
2. Ahamad, S. (2020). Influences of parental socio-economic status on academic achievement: a case study of rural communities in kailali, nepal. Contemporary Research: An Interdisciplinary Academic Journal, 4(1), 116-130. https://doi.org/10.3126/craiaj.v4i1.32753
3. ASER. (2019). Annual Status of Education Report(Rural). New Delhi.
4. Ashcraft, M., & Krause, J. (2007). Working memory,math performance, and math anxiety. 2(14), 243-248. https://doi.org/10.5738/BF03194059
5. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
6. Bhatta, S., Budhathoki, C. B., & Pant, B. P. (2019). Equity gaps in STEM education. 2, 147-166.
7. Bhatta, T. R., Budhathoki, C. B., & Pant, B. P. (2021). Teachers' challenges in implementing student-centered pedagogy in nepalese schools. Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 5(10), 450-458. https://www.rsisinternational.org
8. Bicer, A., & Capraro, R. M. (2019). Mathematics achievement in the secondary high school context of STEM and non-STEM schools. School Science and Mathematics, 119(2), 61-71. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12321
9. Blatchford, P., Bassett, P., & Brown, P. (2011). Examining the effect of class size on classroom engagement and teacher-pupil interaction: differences in relation to pupil prior attainment and primary vs. secondary schools. Learning and Instruction, 21(6), 715–730. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LEARNINSTRUC.2011.04.001
10. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Harvard University Press.
11. Byrnes, J. P., & Miller, D. C. (2007). The relative importance of predictors of math and science achievement: an opportunity-propensity analysis. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(4), 599-629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.09.002
12. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. Routledge.
13. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5 ed.). SAGE Publications.
14. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative Inquiry and research design. SAGE Publications.
15. Dweck, C. (2006). The new psychology of success. Random House.
16. Education Review Office. (2025). National assessment of student achievement 2023: main report-grade 10. Bhaktapur. https://www.ero.gov.np
17. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5 ed.). SAGE Publications.
18. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning. A synthesis of over 800 meta-analysis relating to achievement.
19. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning:A synthesis of over 800 meta-analysis relating to achievement. Routledge.
20. Hill, H. C., L, B. D., Loewenberg, D., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: conceptualizing and predicting teachers' lexicalized knowledge of students and mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372-400. https://doi.org/10.2307/40539302
21. Kappassova, S., Abylkassymova, A., Bulut, U., Zykrina, S., Zhumagulova, Z., & Balta, N. (2025). Mathematical literacy and its influencing factors: a decade of research findings. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(7), 1305-8223. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/16615
22. Leung, F. K. (2001). In search of an East Asian Identity in Mathematics Education.Educational Educational Studies in Mathematics. (Vol. 1).
23. Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22(140), 1-55.
24. Ma, X., & Kishor, N. (1997). Assessing the relationship between attitude toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(1), 26-47. https://doi.org/10.2307/749662
25. Manandhar, D. C., & Koirala, S. P. (2021). Role of private school on continuing education in the context of COVID-19 in nepal. International Research Journal of MMC, 2(1), 41-50. https://doi.org/10.3126/irjmmc.v2i1.35128
26. OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Results:Excellence and Equity in Education (Vol. I). OECD Publishing.
27. OECD. (2018). Equity in Education: Breaking Down Barriers to Social Mobility. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264305229-en
28. OECD. (2023). Education at a glance 2023: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/e13bef63-en
29. Ramirez, G., Chang, H., Maloney, E. A., Levine, S. c., & Beilock, S. L. (2018). On the relationship between math anxity and math achievement in early elementary school. The role of problem-solving strategies. , 1-15.
30. Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832
31. Sharma, L. R. (2022). Identifying the Benefits and Challenges of Digital Technology and Online. International Research Journal of MMC, 3(2), 26-32. https://doi.org/10.3126/irjmmc.v3i2.46297
32. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics. Pearson Education.
33. UNESCO. (2018). Global education monitoring report gender review 2018: meeting our commitments to gender equality in education. UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000261593
34. UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report. Inclusion and Education, Paris.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Research Journal of MMC (IRJMMC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
