Bachelor-Level Student Dropouts in Nepal: Causes and Strategies for Retention
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3126/irjmmc.v7i3.97128Keywords:
academic integration, bachelor's level, strategies for retention, secondary data, causes of student attritionAbstract
Student attrition at the undergraduate level represents a critical institutional and socioeconomic challenge within the higher education landscape. This study investigates causes of college dropout, and strategies for their retention. This study adopted a narrative research design in which primary data were gathered from 10 college dropouts in the faculty of education in 2025, whereas secondary data were collected from books, and journal articles. The research findings revealed that undergraduate attrition was driven by an intersection of compounding factors, primarily severe financial constraints, rigid theoretical curricula, lacking practical market relevance, pedagogical disengagement, and a profound deficit in structured institutional support mechanisms like academic advising and career counseling. Psychologically, feelings of academic isolation and low self-esteem further accelerate student alienation. Based on these findings, this study concludes that mitigating student attrition requires a structural shift from reactive management to a holistic, student-centric retention ecosystem. This study is significant because it identifies the major causes of bachelor-level student dropouts in Nepal and provides evidence-based retention strategies to support policymakers, educational institutions, teachers, and other stakeholders in improving student persistence, reducing dropout rates, and enhancing the quality and equity of higher education.
Downloads
References
1. Analytical Reports in International Education. (2008). Analytical Reports in International Education, 2(1), 29–48.
2. Ishitani, T. T., & DesJardins, S. L. (2002). A longitudinal investigation of dropout from college in the United States. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 4(2), 173–201. doi.org
3. Matschke, C., de Vreeze, J., & Cress, U. (2023). Social identities and the achievement gap: Incompatibility between social class background and student identity increases student disidentification, which decreases performance and leads to higher dropout rates. British Journal of Social Psychology, 62(1), 161–180. doi.org
4. Parajuli, K. P. (2021). Challenges faced by Bachelors level students at a community campus in Nepal. Campus Journal of Research, 4(1), 45–58.
5. Parr, A. K., & Bonitz, V. S. (2015). Role of family background, student behaviors, and school-related beliefs in predicting high school dropout. The Journal of Educational Research, 108(6), 504–514. doi.org
6. Rumberger, R. W. (2001). Why students drop out of school and what can be done. Center for Research on the Education of Students Placed At Risk, University of California, Santa Barbara.
7. Rumberger, R. W., Ghatak, R., Poulos, G., Ritter, P. L., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1990). Family influences on dropout behavior in one California high school. Sociology of Education, 63(4), 283–299. doi.org
8. Stearns, E., & Glennie, E. J. (2006). When and why dropouts leave high school. Youth & Society, 38(1), 29–57. doi.org
9. Sweet, R. (1986). Student dropout in distance education: An application of Tinto's model. Distance Education, 7(2), 201–213. doi.org
10. Yukselturk, E., Ozekes, S., & Turel, Y. K. (2014). Predicting dropout student: An application of data mining methods in an online education program. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 17(1), 118–133. doi.org
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Research Journal of MMC (IRJMMC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
