Research in the Age of AI – How to Plan? A Bibliometric Exploration of the Research Lifecycle

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3126/irjmmc.v7i3.97169

Keywords:

research lifecycle, artificial intelligence, generative AI, AI-enhanced research planning, five-phase framework, human touch, bibliometric analysis

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI), particularly generative AI and large language models (LLMs), is rapidly transforming research planning by enhancing literature synthesis, research problem formulation, methodology selection, and workflow management. Despite this rapid adoption, limited evidence exists regarding the intellectual structure, thematic evolution, and responsible integration of AI within research planning. Therefore, this study systematically maps the scientific landscape of AI-assisted research planning through a bibliometric analysis of publications indexed in the Scopus database between 2017 and 2026. Bibliographic data were analysed using Biblioshiny (Bibliometrix) and VOSviewer to examine publication trends, influential contributors, collaboration networks, intellectual structure, and thematic development. The findings reveal a rapidly expanding research domain, with an annual publication growth rate of 51.08%, reflecting the increasing integration of AI into research planning. Science mapping identifies research management, artificial intelligence, machine learning, and large language models as the dominant research themes, while thematic evolution demonstrates a shift from foundational AI technologies towards AI-enabled research management and workflows. However, the analysis also reveals a significant conceptual imbalance, with technological advancements outpacing the development of governance, trust, ethics, and human–AI collaboration. To address this gap, the study proposes a five-phase framework comprising Strategic Conceptualisation, Systematic Literature Synthesis, Methodology Selection, Governance, Ethics and Trust, and Continuous Reflection and Feedback, positioning the human touch, curiosity, critical thinking, creativity, contextual expertise, and ethical judgement, as the foundation of responsible AI-assisted research planning. The study contributes both a comprehensive knowledge map and a human-centred conceptual framework that provide practical guidance for researchers, scholars, and policymakers seeking to promote the responsible, transparent, and sustainable integration of AI throughout the research planning process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Niranjan Devkota, Government of Nepal

    Center for Economic and Infrastructure Development Policy

    Policy Research Institute

  • Majibur Rahman Siddique, Pokhara University

    Quest Resaerch Management Cell

    Quest International College, Gwarko, Lalitpur, Nepal. 

  • Dipendra Karki, Tribhuvan University

    Nepal Commerce Campus

  • Dejina Thapa, Government of Nepal

    Research Department, Policy Research Institute

References

1. Basnet, P., Devkota, N., Chapagain, R. K., & Mahapatra, S. K. (2024). Paving the Way to the Gig Economy: A Bibliometric Analysis of Workers' Decade-Long Involvement. Economic Journal of Nepal, 47(1-2), 43-64. https://doi.org/10.3126/ejon.v47i1-2.80899

2. Budhathoki, S., Devkota, N., & Lawaju, P. (2026). Agricultural Transformation 2.0: A Bibliometric Study. Himalayan Global Researchers' Network (HGRN), 1(1), 4-16. https://doi.org/10.66562/hjmr.1.1.002

3. Burger, B., Kanbach, D. K., Kraus, S., Breier, M., & Corvello, V. (2023). On the use of AI-based tools like ChatGPT to support management research. European journal of innovation management, 26(7), 233-241. https://www.emerald.com/ejim/article-pdf/26/7/233/147158/ejim-02-2023-0156.pdf

4. Camilleri, M. A. (2024). Artificial intelligence governance: Ethical considerations and implications for social responsibility. Expert systems, 41(7), e13406. https://doi.org/10.1111/exsy.13406

5. Carobene, A., Padoan, A., Cabitza, F., Banfi, G., & Plebani, M. (2024). Rising adoption of artificial intelligence in scientific publishing: evaluating the role, risks, and ethical implications in paper drafting and review process. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), 62(5), 835-843. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2023-1136

6. Christou, P. A. (2023). How to use artificial intelligence (AI) as a resource, methodological and analysis tool in qualitative research?. Qualitative Report, 28(7). https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2023.6406

7. Doğan, M., Celik, A., & Arslan, H. (2025). AI in higher education: risks and opportunities from the academician perspective. European Journal of Education, 60(1), e12863. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12863

8. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

9. Farid, G. (2024). Ethical considerations regarding the use of artificial intelligence tools in research and publication. Kurdish Studies. DOI: 10.53555/ks.v12i4.3133

10. Filetti, S., Fenza, G., & Gallo, A. (2024). Research design and writing of scholarly articles: New artificial intelligence tools available for researchers. Endocrine, 85(3), 1104-1116. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12020-024-03977-z

11. Grillo, R. (2023). The rising tide of artificial intelligence in scientific journals: A profound shift in research landscape. https://doi.org/10.58600/eurjther1735

12. Hassan, W., & Duarte, A. E. (2024). Bibliometric analysis: a few suggestions. Current problems in cardiology, 49(8), 102640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2024.102640

13. Khalifa, M., & Albadawy, M. (2024). Using artificial intelligence in academic writing and research: An essential productivity tool. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine update, 5, 100145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpbup.2024.100145

14. Khanal, G., Devkota, N., Chapagain, R., & Khanal, C. K. (2025). The Evolution of Carbon Market: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Study. Green and Low-Carbon Economy. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewGLCE52026119

15. Lawaju, P., Adhikari, S. U., & Devkota, J. (2024). Impact of AI in education: An evidence from use of ChatGPT in management education in Nepal. Quest Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 6(3), 621-642. https://doi.org/10.3126/qjmss.v6i3.72875

16. Lendvai, G. F. (2025). ChatGPT in academic writing: A scientometric analysis of literature published between 2022 and 2023. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 20(3), 131-148. https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646251350203

17. Lowar, D. B., Devkota, N., & Siddique, M. R. (2025). Mapping the Global Research on Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG): A Bibliometric Analysis. NCC Journal, 10(1), 69-88. https://doi.org/10.3126/nccj.v10i1.95031

18. Mahajan, P. (2025). The Soul of the AI: Governance, Ethics, and the Future of Human–AI Integration. https://hal.science/hal-05140138/

19. Mangubat, F. M., & Saeedi, K. H. (2025). A bibliometric analysis of research trends in the application of artificial intelligence by college students in research writing. Discover Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-01067-4

20. Maris, S., Slavici, T., Nenu, P., & Baciu, L. (2017). Artificial Intelligence as a Decision-making Tool in Planning the Research. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 8(3), 69-76. https://www.edusoft.ro/brain/index.php/brain/article/view/710

21. Mishra, N., Bhandari, N., Maraseni, T., Devkota, N., Khanal, G., Bhusal, B., ... & Danuwar, R. K. (2024). Technology in farming: Unleashing farmers’ behavioral intention for the adoption of agriculture 5.0. Plos one, 19(8), e0308883. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0308883

22. Nguyen, K. V. (2025). The use of generative AI tools in higher education: Ethical and pedagogical principles. Journal of Academic Ethics, 23(3), 1435-1455. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10805-025-09607-1

23. Oyelude, A. A. (2024). Artificial intelligence (AI) tools for academic research. Library Hi Tech News, 41(8), 18-20. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-08-2024-0131

24. Panthi, H., Devkota, N., Koirala, P., & Danuwar, R. K. (2025). Social Protection in Shaping Labor Migration Decisions among Youth in South Asia: A Bibliometric Analysis. Quest Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 7(2), 524-537. https://doi.org/10.3126/qjmss.v7i2.87817

25. Passas, I. (2024). Bibliometric analysis: the main steps. Encyclopedia, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia4020065

26. Sahar, R., & Munawaroh, M. (2025). Artificial intelligence in higher education with bibliometric and content analysis for future research agenda. Discover Sustainability, 6(1), 401. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43621-025-01086-z

27. Siddique, M. R., Devkota, N., Lowar, D. B., Paudel, U. R., Kunwar, R., & Lawaju, P. (2026). Responsible Generative Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable Pedagogy Systems: A Conceptual Framework for the Global South. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 21(2), 4. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v21i02.60809

28. Sontake, P. (2025). A review on artificial intelligence (AI) tools in research writing. International journal of scientific research and technology, 2(5), 85-102. https://www.ijsrtjournal.com/article/A+Review+on+Artificial+Intelligence+AI+Tools+in+Research+Writing

29. Tawfik, W. (2024). A strategic review of the impact of modern technologies on scientific research: AI, lasers, and nanotechnology. Journal of Laser Science and Applications, 1(2), 38-48. https://journals.ekb.eg/article_409335.html

30. Valencia-Coronel, B., Marescaux, J. F., & Gimenez, M. (2026). Artificial intelligence-based tools for optimizing surgical research publications. Artificial Intelligence Surgery, 6(1), 36-60. https://doi.org/10.20517/ais.2025.112

31. Wang, D., & Luo, T. (2026). From object to instrument: a perspective on AI as a governance enabler for responsible research and innovation. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 13(1), 2675074. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2026.2675074

32. Xu, Y., Liu, X., Cao, X., Huang, C., Liu, E., Qian, S., ... & Zhang, J. (2021). Artificial intelligence: A powerful paradigm for scientific research. The innovation, 2(4). https://www.cell.com/article/S2666-6758(21)00104-1/fulltext

33. Zahra, W., & Rautela, G. (2024). Revolutionizing learning landscapes: Unleashing the potential of AI in the realm of academic research. In Artificial intelligence: A multidisciplinary approach towards teaching and learning (pp. 242-264). Bentham Science Publishers. https://doi.org/10.2174/97898153051801240101

34. Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Li, L. D. (2024). The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students' cognitive abilities: a systematic review. Smart learning environments, 11(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7

Downloads

Published

2026-07-15

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 3 (2026)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 International Research Journal of MMC (IRJMMC)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Research in the Age of AI – How to Plan? A Bibliometric Exploration of the Research Lifecycle. (2026). International Research Journal of MMC (IRJMMC), 7(3), 94-116. https://doi.org/10.3126/irjmmc.v7i3.97169

Similar Articles

1-10 of 289

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)